1337x is blocked in India by court-ordered ISP filtering, not a global takedown. See why, what the law says, and how VPN Super keeps browsing private.
Reviewed by the VPN Super team · Last updated October 5, 2026
Yes, 1337x is banned in India. If you're on an Indian internet connection and you try to load the site's main address, you'll likely land on a blocked-page notice instead of the torrent index. Indian courts have ordered internet providers to stop resolving the domain, so the block happens at the ISP level, not because 1337x has gone offline. The site's servers are still running somewhere outside India; a regular Indian connection just can't reach them anymore.
That distinction explains most of what people actually want to know here: why the block keeps showing up on new domains, what your real legal exposure looks like, and why the mirror sites that promise a way back in carry their own risk.
India blocks 1337x under its copyright law rather than a separate internet-censorship statute. The Copyright Act, 1957 gives rights holders like film studios, music labels, and software publishers a legal path to go to court when their work is being distributed without permission. Section 51 defines what counts as infringement, and Section 63 sets the criminal penalties for knowingly infringing.
When a rights holder shows a court that a site like 1337x is a habitual source of pirated content, the court can order internet service providers to stop connecting users to that domain. The Department of Telecommunications then pushes the order out to ISPs nationwide, which is why the block looks the same whether you're on home broadband or a mobile carrier.
For 1337x specifically, the Delhi High Court ordered Indian ISPs to block it, along with The Pirate Bay, RARBG, and Torrentz2, in an April 2019 order by Justice Manmohan, as reported by TorrentFreak on April 12, 2019.
“Banned” here means blocked at the ISP level, not deleted from the internet. Indian courts order local providers to stop resolving 1337x's domain name or routing traffic to its known addresses. The site's own servers, wherever they're actually hosted, sit outside an Indian court's reach.
That's also why mirror sites keep showing up. A mirror is the same content served from a different domain. Block one, and a new one appears. Courts have made this faster to police by letting rights holders add newly discovered mirror domains onto an existing blocking order instead of filing a fresh case each time. The Delhi High Court introduced this “dynamic injunction” approach in 2020 (Managing IP). That's quicker for enforcement, but it also means the list of blocked domains never really stops growing.
“Blocked” and “shut down” are different outcomes. In a few well-known cases, authorities elsewhere have identified who ran a torrent site, made arrests, and taken the whole operation offline. 1337x has never fit that pattern; its operators have stayed anonymous throughout the site's history. From the outside, an ISP-level block and an actual takedown can look similar, but the mechanism behind each one is different.
Under the Copyright Act, knowingly infringing someone's copyright is a punishable offense. Section 63 sets the penalty at imprisonment of six months to three years plus a fine of Rs 50,000 to Rs 2,00,000, with a proviso that lets a court impose a lighter sentence, for adequate reasons, where the infringement wasn't made for gain in the course of trade or business (Section 63 text). That legal exposure exists regardless of whether the infringing copy came from a torrent, a direct download link, or anywhere else.
The Delhi High Court's 2019 blocking order also looked beyond the sites themselves. The court suggested that authorities explore sending emails, pop-ups, or other warnings to people who keep accessing infringing content, and said a fine could be levied on viewers who ignore those warnings (TorrentFreak, April 12, 2019). That was a suggestion in the judgment, not a described enforcement program, so this page can't say how often anyone has actually been warned or fined. Personal downloading still isn't risk-free.
Not reliably. The risk is more specific than the generic “torrents can carry viruses” warning you've probably already heard.
Patterns to watch for on mirror and proxy pages:
There's also a pattern specific to this space in India: clone sites that copy 1337x's branding and layout but exist purely to serve region-targeted scam ads, or to push a fake “premium unlock” payment form that's really just there to collect your card details.
The underlying problem is structural. A torrent index has no content moderation and no review process. There's nothing like the vetting Google Play or the App Store applies before software reaches you. Anyone can put anything on a mirror page, and nobody checks it before you land there.
These terms get used interchangeably, but they describe different things, and the difference matters for understanding what actually gets blocked and how.
| Term | What it actually is | How a block applies |
|---|---|---|
| Torrent site (e.g., 1337x) | An index of .torrent files and magnet links; it doesn't host the actual media files itself | The domain is blocked directly by a court order |
| Mirror / proxy | A copy of the same index reachable through a different domain, or a pass-through server in front of it | Blocked once a court adds that specific domain to the order |
| Cyberlocker | A file-hosting service where the copyrighted file itself sits on a server | Handled file-by-file, or by targeting the hosting service directly, rather than one domain-wide order |
None of the above is about getting past anything. It's about understanding what's actually going on. Separately, no matter what sites you visit, it helps to protect your connection on networks you don't control.
Say you're on the free Wi-Fi at a train station or a café. That network is usually unencrypted, which means anyone else on it, or whoever runs the router, can potentially see which sites you're loading, even if they can't read the content of an HTTPS page. Turning on a VPN before you connect closes that gap. Your traffic is encrypted between your device and VPN Super's server, so the only thing visible on that local network is that you're connected to a VPN, not which pages you're opening.
This kind of general privacy protection is what VPN Super is built for.
On iOS and Android specifically, VPN Super also shipped a Kill Switch in August 2026. Turn it on and your internet access pauses automatically if the VPN connection drops, so you're not briefly exposed on the open network while it reconnects. It's off by default, and it isn't available yet on Windows or Mac.
Yes. Indian ISPs are under court order to block it. Enforcement isn't perfectly uniform, though. Some telecom circles and ISPs apply a new blocking order faster than others, which is why people sometimes report a domain “still working for me” for a few days after a block is announced elsewhere.
Because of how the court orders are written. Once a court blocks the original domain, it typically also lets the rights holder add newly discovered mirror domains to that same order later, rather than requiring an entirely new case each time a new one appears. That's the mechanical reason mirrors keep getting blocked one after another instead of the issue getting resolved once.
No. India isn't the only country using court-ordered ISP filtering against 1337x-style sites; several others do the same. “Blocked in a country” and “taken offline” are different things wherever it happens. The site's servers keep running outside whichever country is filtering it.
Loading the page itself and actually downloading or distributing a copyrighted file are treated differently. Visiting a page doesn't automatically mean you've infringed anything. Downloading, and with torrents, simultaneously uploading pieces to other users, is where the copyright exposure comes in.
Beyond the legal exposure under the Copyright Act, there's a technical detail a lot of people miss: BitTorrent works by having your device upload pieces of the file to other people while you're downloading it. That means you're not just receiving a file, you're actively distributing it at the same time, which is a meaningfully larger legal exposure than a one-way download would be.
No. A mirror serves identical infringing content from a different address, so it carries the same copyright status as the original. It's a workaround for the block, not a workaround for the law.
Technically, yes. By default your device sends its DNS lookups, the requests that translate a domain name into an address, to your ISP's resolver, so the ISP can see which domain names are being looked up. How a given ISP applies a block and what it records varies by provider, and no public source confirms that Indian ISPs log or report individual users' lookups.
The ISP-visibility question above is about your home or mobile connection. Public Wi-Fi adds a separate risk: anyone else sharing that same network, not just the ISP, can potentially see your unencrypted traffic. Turning on a VPN before you connect to a café, airport, or train station network closes both gaps at once by encrypting your connection from your device outward.
Is Website BannedIs 1337x Banned in UK?Learn why UK banned 1337x and how you can access it using a VPN in 3 simple steps.
Is Website BannedIs Baidu Banned in India?Learn why India banned Baidu and how you can access it using a VPN in 3 simple steps.Is Website BannedIs 1337x Banned in Australia?Learn why Australia banned 1337x and how you can access it using a VPN in 3 simple steps.